Òù69

MENU

Oct. 6 alert: Òù69 Tech is carefully monitoring Hurricane Milton as it moves through the Gulf of Mexico, and is modifying operations. For class cancelation and office closure information, view the emergency information page.

Sky View Through an Archway on Campus

Editing Help

Please reference the Faculty Profile Editing Guide if you have any questions or issues updating your profile. If you receive any error notices please contact webservices@fit.edu.

Andrew Aberdein

Professor | College of Psych. and Liberal Arts - School of Arts and Communication

Chair of Humanities

Contact Information

aberdein@fit.edu
(321) 674-8368
Frederick C. Crawford Bldg, 624





Professional Experience

Dr. Aberdein has taught at Òù69 Tech since 2003. He has also held visiting research positions at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland and the University of Windsor in Ontario. Prior to his appointment at Òù69 Tech he was a Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Edinburgh. He graduated with a Ph.D. in Logic & Metaphysics from the University of St. Andrews in 2001.

Selected Publications

. In Engaging populism: Democracy and the intellectual virtues, Gregory R. Peterson, Michael Berhow, & George Tsakiridis, edd. (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022), pp. 147–63.

 (with Jakub ±Ê°ù³ÜÅ›). Informal logic 42(1), 2022, pp. 23–45.

 (with Colin Jakob Rittberg & Fenner Stanley Tanswell). Synthese 199(3–4), 2021, pp. 10167–80.

. Topoi 40(5), 2021, pp. 1205–12.

 In Essays on argumentation in antiquity, Joseph Bjelde, David Merry, & Christopher Roser, edd. (Cham: Springer, 2021), pp. 215–29.

. Journal of applied logics 8(1), 2021, pp. 159–82.

. In Polarisation, arrogance, and dogmatism: Philosophical perspectives, Alessandra Tanesini & Michael P. Lynch, edd. (London: Routledge, 2020), pp. 39–52.

. In The Routledge handbook of philosophy of humility, Mark Alfano, Michael P. Lynch, & Alessandra Tanesini, edd. (London: Routledge, 2020), pp. 325–34.

. In From argument schemes to argumentative relations in the wild: A variety of contributions to argumentation theory, Frans H. van Eemeren & Bart Garssen, edd. (Cham: Springer, 2020), pp. 97–106.

 (with Matthew Inglis). ZDM mathematics education 52(6), 2020, pp. 1127–36.

 (with Alison Pease, Ursula Martin, & Fenner Stanley Tanswell). ZDM mathematics education 52(6), 2020, pp. 1087–98.

 (edited with Matthew Inglis). (London: Bloomsbury, 2019).

. In Monsters, monstrosities, and the monstrous in culture and society, Diego Compagna & Stefanie Steinhart, edd. (Wilmington, DE: Vernon Press, 2019), pp. 391–412.

. ZDM mathematics education 51(5), 2019, pp. 825–34.

 (with Alison Pease & Ursula Martin). Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society A 377, 2019.

. Argumentation 32(1), 2018, pp. 1–23.

. In , Moti Mizrahi, ed. (London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2018), pp. 133–54.

. Òù69 philosophical review 16(1), 2016, pp. 1–11.

. Topoi 35(2), 2016, pp. 413–22.

(with Matthew Inglis). Philosophia mathematica 23(1), 2015, pp. 87–109.

(with Adina Arvatu). (Glastonbury: Wooden, 2015).

. Informal logic 34(1), 2014, pp. 77–93.

, (edited with Ian Dove). (Dordrecht: Springer, 2013).

. , 5(2), 2013, pp. 231–50.

The judo principle, philosophical method and the logic of jokes. In , Nicholas Joll, ed. (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), pp. 213–35.

 (with ). 20(1-2), 2011, pp. 7-57.

Strange bedfellows: The interpenetration of philosophy and pornography. In , Dave Monroe, ed. (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), pp. 22-34.

. In , Bart Van Kerkhove, Jonas De Vuyst, & Jean Paul Van Bendegem, edd. (London: College Publications, 2010), pp. 269-300.

. , 24(2), 2010, pp. 165-179.

The philosophy of alternative logics (with ). In  L. Haaparanta, ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 627-738.

Research

  • Knowledge and justification in mathematical practice
  • Explanation, especially in mathematics
  • Error and theory change in science
  • Virtue theory, especially as applied to argumentation

Research & Project Interests

Much of Dr. Aberdein's research is concerned with the interplay of formal and informal accounts of human reason. He is particularly interested in argumentation theory, and its use in understanding science, technology, and mathematics.